Feed on
Posts
Comments

The Meetzorp Dream Barn

Inspired both by Petrol Blog‘s “dream barn” series and a conversation Joel and I had at dinner the other night, I decided to write up my own “dream barn” scenario. Basically, if I had the space and the money to do so, I’d probably own five or six completely ludicrous cars simply because I like them.

Of course the first car in the barn door will be my longterm project car, the infamous 1959 VW Type 1, last seen looking like this:
IMG_4147
Only because this is the Dream Barn, it’s finally fixed up. The rust repairs are done, the paintwork is gleaming, and the interior is installed and smelling nice, like horsehair, jute, rubber matting, and sweetgrass potpourri, which I’ve always liked to stuff in the ashtray.

Next on the list would be a debased and defaced vintage Jaguar. I really fancy a 1970s-era X-type with a Chevy 350 in it. There are two on Craigslist right now, and by god, if I were doing anything other than grocery-store clerking right now, I would absolutely buy the ’74, because I like the color best (it’s a beautiful wine red, as you’ll see below. The ’78 is white, which I just don’t like as much, and if you are pretend-buying a ridiculous car, you might as well buy the one in the color you like!)
74 Jaguar XJ12
I figure this would pass as a sensible car. 4-doors. Chevy reliability. And since the value of a Jag plummets when you’ve installed a non-stock powerplant, this is a car you could drive around without stressing that you’re somehow going to depreciate it further via use. See also Roadkill:

Now moving further into fantasyland, I’d love to have a fairly clapped-out, but mechanically sound-enough late-1970s Porsche 911. Preferably one with a bit of rust and a few parking lot dings, so that I would have no reservations about hooning it. There are three reasons why I’d like to have an older Porsche. #1, they’re just fucking beautiful. #2, as a VW-savvy nerd, I should be able to adapt my knowledge to maintaining it. #3, the engine noise. God above, that exhaust note:

Now the odd-bird selection, which obviously would be a Citroën 2CV. As I’ve mentioned recently, it’s a car that has long fascinated me, and since I’m obviously just daydreaming here, we’ll assume I was able to find one.

I know only the very sad will find this interesting, but I honestly enjoyed watching this video of a bit of a 2CV’s suspension doing its job. Four-wheel independent suspension on an economy car was pretty revolutionary.

And speaking of revolutionary, there’s always the Citroën DS, which is frankly, a lot more stylish than the 2CV. Seriously, isn’t that a swoopy, style-y, pretty little thing? Those indicator lights up in the C-Pillars! I love those little chrome cones they’re mounted in. It’s just so clever.

Now a car I know of that exists locally, and which I admire from sort-of-afar nearly daily is a particularly nice example of a 1948 Ford coupe.
191_9103
Sure, it’s got some weird dents in the roof, but it doesn’t appear to ever have been over and it certainly looks super-complete.
191_9106
My Dad had one of these way back in the day, and I have just always liked that body shape. I have no idea how I’d set it up, but I’d imagine it would be a mild resto-rod project. No crazy lowered suspension, no radical big horsepower, no insane, flip-flop paint jobs. Just a nice, functional, basically-driveable, old-fashioned car. Essentially, the Ford version of my Volkswagen, only 10 years older. This engine that likely came in this car originally made about 100 horsepower in a car that weighed around two tons. It was just enough oomph to get it up to about 80mph, which I expect, was plenty exciting, if 80 in the old VW is anything to judge by. One of the things I love about primitive old cars is that you don’t need a lot of speed to get a lot of excitement. If you simply drive it in ordinary conditions, with respect to its engineering limitations, there’s just the inherent challenge in coping with the road to keep you entertained.

I kinda like that sound, you know?

So, as I said, if I had the space, money, and time, I’d have about half a dozen completely impractical and ridiculous cars in varying states of decay or restoration, and people would probably say, “That woman is really an odd bird.”

Tom Watta Nightmare!

(NB: This is expanded from a comment I left at Fussy.org)

Untitled-Scanned-62
Look at this kid? Does she look to you like a young’n whose métier is selling crap, or does she look like a kid who’d slink off to one or another of several semi-secret hideaways and draw paper dolls or read Little House Books?

When I was a little girl, around about 10 (that’s 5th grade, right?) we had to sell stupid baubles and shit from some outfit called Tom Watt Showcase. We were given this horrible cardboard “briefcase” filled with gaudy christmas ornaments, shoddy toys, chintzy school supplies, and hideous, goose-bedecked household tat.

I was not one of nature’s salesgirls. I was already developing a rather wry sense of humor and had a pretty good bullshit detector for a kid. I knew the crap I was lugging from house to house was crap. I didn’t want to sell crap. I wanted to hang out in the warm corner by the chimney reading down my latest library haul.

Because my parents aren’t of the “joiner” persuasion, either, I hadn’t already been tempered in the fires of Girlscout cookie sales, Campfire candy sales, or 4H fruit sales. My parents also didn’t have the sorts of jobs where they could just take the sales flyer to work, post it in the breakroom, and rake it in. Nor did such tactics meet with their approval. If the school said I had to sell crap on behalf of the school, then by god I was the one to be selling the crap.

So, my Dad hauled me around to the houses of his various friends, and I grudgingly delivered my spiel, which was along the lines of, “I’ve got to sell this junk for school. It’s not very good, so I understand if you don’t want any of it, but I have to show it to you anyway.”

I’d proceed to unpack the lot of crap, warning people away from the egregiously shoddy items. I managed to sell maybe five boxes of christmas baubles and a set of colored pencils with little rainbows printed on them.

It was awful.

When I went on my most recent library run, Joel had a request for me: to pick up some about-pregnancy-and-babies books, as he felt he had some knowledge gaps which he’d like to fill in.

Of the books I picked out, only one of them didn’t elicit gales of derisive laughter, voluminous swearing, and heavy sarcasm. That book was the Don’t Panic Pregnancy Book which was concise, straightforward, sensible, and not full of nauseating cutesy language, patronising advice, and scare tactics.

However, it didn’t really offer any especially illuminating information. Because it is so commonsense, if you have a reasonably functioning grasp on how shit works, it is a bit superfluous.

Your Pregnancy For The Father To Be provided us with much hilarity. Mostly because it seemed that their favorite piece of advice, for just about any occasion, was massage. One thing about me is that I am not good at getting a massage.

I’m not very touchy to begin with. I’m not a huggy person. I’m a hell of a handshaker. I’ve got a good handshake, dry, firm, competent. No sweaty floppiness, nor any knuckle-busting aggression. I’ll high-five you any day of the week. But I have to remind myself that there are some people who hug and if I kind of sidle away I am being kind of an asshole. Therefore I do try to make the effort, but I’m afraid usually I do that sort of “dude hug” which mostly involves shoulders and a few pats on the back.

Moreover, I am absolutely crap at, like, making myself relax. I can relax when I can relax. There are some things I find very relaxing. A long, quiet bike ride. Sitting down by the river and watching fish jump. Taking photos. Weeding my garden boxes. Watching people blow things up on the Internet. Burning colored smoke-balls on the patio. However, when it comes to doing yoga or meditating, or submitting to a massage, it all goes wrong. I get self-conscious. I get the giggles. I get tense and stiff and anticipate the massage hitting a muscle wrong and making me cramp up. And then, of course I cramp up. And if the person giving the massage isn’t very good at reading nonverbal vocal cues, they might think my “aarghs” of discomfort are grunts of relief. So it usually ends in me asking, “I’m sorry, I know you’re trying to do me a favor, but this hurts, so would you mind if we just don’t?”

So, it becomes clear why a book which seems to offer massage as a potential sop to various and sundry discomforts of pregnancy would elicit a few stern glances from this member of the party.

I picked up The Everything Guide To Pregnancy Over 35, which, unfortunately I found equal parts condescending and alarmist, with a piquant garnish of irrelevance.

The part that really lit my bloomers on fire was a tsk-tsky section on preparing yourself for the financial, social, and personal life changes a baby will bring. Given that consideration of all of the above is a fair whack of what has delayed my entry into the motherhood gambit until the apparently doddering age of 35, I would say that I have adequately mentally prepared. In fact, if I am honest, I rather welcome the excuse to dodge out of social events in noisy bars where shitty white-guy-blues bands may be lunking out their predictable sounds. I’m already resigned to being poor. Hell, I majored in English. I pretty much signed on a line 15+ years ago agreeing to have no earning potential. Kid’s just going to have to learn to live without violin lessons and hockey league. I’m 35 years old, for the love of mercy. I know, understand, accept, and welcome the fact that shit’s gonna change. I am aware that my introvert side will probably struggle with a diminished amount of “alone time” for recharging, but I’m sure I, like many other hermit-moms before me, will learn to cope.

The Active Woman’s Guide to Pregnancy was the other book I checked out. Thought it might have some useful info on some stretching and strengthening exercises to help me deal with the hip, groin, and butt pain I’ve been experiencing lately. It didn’t offer much beyond what I’d already been doing, and, in fact, was essentially 282 pages to say what I’d already read online in about eight paragraphs.

Which boils down to: “if you were already active and athletic before pregnancy, carry on, just don’t push yourself into anaerobic territory. If you were sedentary before pregnancy, try to begin a gentle workout schedule, but don’t go too crazy and stress your body out. Do pelvic tilts, cat-and-cow yoga thingies, and stuff like the butterfly stretch to help strengthen your core and all that. Swimming is good. If you can afford it, you should go swimming or take a pregnant-ladies-water-aerobics class.” It gives risk assessments for various activities at various stages of pregnancy, which is helpful, but I found the book a bit windy on what is essentially a pretty simple subject. Move it, don’t push it.

So, I will continue on with my daily bike ride to work, basic bicycle-based errand running, my yoga-ish-stuff-for-people-who-get-the-giggles-and-fart-too-much, and your basic school-gym calisthenic stretching. May have to revise some of the bikey stuff in a few months, when and as my belly becomes more obtrusive, but you know. Bridge to be crossed when encountered.

Honest. But I wasn’t feeling real good for a couple of days, then I got distracted this afternoon.

You see, I was perusing Bangshift, as you do, and came across this article about a nut who put an old aircraft engine into an old Toyota MR2 and raced it in the 24 Hours of LeMons.

Which, of course, made me think of Bill Cosby’s routine about Fat Albert’s Cessna-powered car. So I had to dig up a link to that monologue. For your listening pleasure I bring you:

That is all.

Sewing for two?

Well, I made a bit more maternity-appropriate clothing in the past week or so. The following dress was made up from some fabric that is so pretty I may well wear it even after the baby is born.

The pattern is Simplicity 5034 from 1973.

Simplicity 6024 1973

With sleeves ganked from another pattern contemporary to it, as I wanted short, flowy sleeves, since this is to be a summer dress.

This is what I ended up with:

IMG_2805

IMG_2806 IMG_2809

This configuration had been used once before, when I was a college-student and very inexperienced seasmstress. I’d used a rayon challis which was very pretty when pressed, but would rumple up into horribleness pretty much immediately.
What I made with this pattern in college. blue1973b
I either threw or gave away this dress years and years ago. It was virtually un-wearable.

Also, to my enduring shame, I once used a variation on this pattern to make myself a Ren Faire dress.

Ren Faire Dress Untitled

I was in College. You experiment during those years. You make decisions you later cringe about. That’s my story, and I’m sticking to it.

The other thing I recently made, which isn’t as pretty, but is of immediate use is a new work blouse.

IMG_2818

We have to wear white blouses, black trousers, and some sort of scarf around our necks as our work uniform. As my boobs are now exceeding the capacity of any of my extant blouses, and I expect my lower abdomen to start making itself obtrusive in the coming weeks and months, I figured rather than fucking around and buying other boring, white blouses a size up, I’d just go whole-hog and make a proper pregnant-lady smock of the old-school style.

Vogue 8709
I used Vogue 8709, which is a contemporary pattern which has elements of the Yves St. Laurent for Dior “Trapeze” line. This was the silhouette favored by ladies of my grandparents’ generation while they were making the Baby Boom. Watch second-series episodes of I Love Lucy, and you’ll see what I’m talking about.

In this case, I used elements from both options in the envelope.

IMG_2815
I used the collar of View A,

IMG_2813
And the sleeves of View B.

IMG_2812
The peplum has a weird little offset pleat in back which I don’t really love, but didn’t really feel like drafting out, either.

IMG_2811
What I do like is how the peplum wraps all the way around from back to front and becomes an integrated part of the draped pockets. I am already loving having the pockets in my work blouse, as I can keep a chapstick, my log-in ID card, my extra “paid” stickers, etc., right close and handy.

It’s not the most beautiful or exciting garment that one could make and wear, but it will do very nicely for what I need. I’ve determined that I am less in favor of the “enhance-your-bump” style of maternity fashion, and more in favor of “wear-a-colossal-tarp” dressing. It just feels more private.

1971 Mercedes-Benz 220 Diesel 4 door

Saw one of these down in the West Bottoms today, only the one I spotted was a really tasty shade of wine red. Similar solid, original, but grubby condition. I’ll take my camera tomorrow and see if I can snap a decent shot of it on my way home from work. It really was a beaut. The hubcaps are painted red to match the bodywork, with the little Mercedes emblem picked out in chrome. I think that is my favorite detail on the car.

I’ve long harbored a bit of a soft spot for these old juggernauts because they are so indisputably stodgy and respectable. This is not a car that was ever chic, hip, or sexy. Stately, proper, faintly aristocratic, but also sluggish, and a bit pompous. If a car could wear spats and a monocle, I reckon this one would.

My first boyfriend’s mother drove an old diesel Merc. Hers was a ’73, if I recall correctly. I didn’t date a rich kid; his dad was a diesel mechanic and had picked up a shelled-out Mercedes for pennies on the original dollar. The previous owner’s son had filled up the tank with gasoline, swiftly rendering the aging luxury car inoperable and practically worthless. Mrs. Weare’s car was an unpleasant butterscotch-pudding-color, but it had cream-colored leather interior with darker brown piping which seemed pretty deluxe to teenaged me. Leather seats tend to hold up beautifully; I’ve seen a number of old cars with leather interiors in nearly perfect shape, while the rest of the car is rusty, shabby, and in a general state of decay.

The best thing about that lumbering old Mercedes was the sound the doors made when you shut them. The entire car was essentially a tank with the tracks taken off and pneumatic tires stuck on. When you shut the door, ever so gently, it made a satisfying clunk. The heavy, wood-trimmed doors hung on stout hinges, and even at 20 years, the car was solid and well-sealed, so the doors didn’t have to be slammed, just given a firm push and whumpclik they were shut and latched.

Joel and I have had a disagreement which led into negotiations. What culminated was a deal, the gist of which is that I’m free to dress the baby in nautical attire until such point as the child is weaned. Fair enough, but I do intend to make the most of it.

Simplicity 4711 Middy Outfit

I bought this pattern about six years ago, when my sister was expecting her little boy, Max. It never got used, because as it turns out, my brother-in-law shares the horror held common among grown men of sailor outfits for small boys.

Now, if you ask me or just about any other auntie or grandma on the planet we’ll tell you that there is nothing cuter than a baby in a sailor outfit. The middy suit is a classic among children’s fashions and is always completely adorable. End of discussion.

Actually, it’s not, though it’s hard to deny the cuteness of little kids in sailor suits. There exists, a Grade-A adorable photo of my esteemed husband as a little fella, probably a year-and-a-half old, standing in the kitchen of the houseboat his parents used to rent, preparing to toss a tennis ball. He was one of those rosy-cheeked, tow-headed little kids who would garner a great deal of public approbation from the maternally inclined. And in this photo, he was wearing a little middy-style romper suit which just blows the cuteness off the Richter scale. He will thank me for not sharing this photograph, so you’ll have to take it from me that it’s freakin’ darling.

I have another pattern which I picked up for a quarter at a junk shop some while past, thinking that I’d use it to make a gift for someone, some day. It’s a much less formal pattern, toddler-oriented, and offers several styling options from the overtly nautical to a much plainer option left free to interpretative embellishment:

Simplicity 5982 sailor outfit

I see plenty of utilitarian potential in this envelope, and even if the child is weaned by the time he or she is in this size, I shall still be able to extract some creative delight from this set of options – I’ll just have to restrain myself from cutting Option D or F. I think if I make this one up, but without the middy collar, I won’t, however, follow the patriotic theme. It’s not exactly my aesthetic.

I had variations on the theme of nautical attire throughout my childhood as both my Grandma Helga and my Mom considered sailor-suits terribly cute and absolutely essential for the small child’s wardrobe. In fact, I can remember the first time in my life when I felt chic, and it was when I was eight years old and I’d gotten a smart little red-and-white sailor suit for my new Best Dress. I wore it for school pictures, for the Christmas Play, and for any other occasion on which I was called upon to dress nicely. It consisted of a boxy, waist-length middy jacket (it was 1985) which had a double-breasted front closure (white buttons on red fabric), white collar with red soutache trim, and white soutache trim at the cuffs. The skirt was white and knife-pleated, with two rows of red soutache trim above the hem. Mom would tie a wide double-sided satin bow around my hair, and I felt so put-together and stylish in my little red sailor-suit. It was seriously one of my favorite items of clothing for as long as it fit. When I outgrew it, it was replaced with another delightfully 1980s outfit consisting of an oversized, chunky-knit red sweater worn over a tiered, ruffled rah-rah skirt in red-and-green plaid.

I am, at the moment, restraining my scissor hand until I know if the baby is to be a boy or a girl. Not because I’m planning an elaborate princess nursery or a macho-macho monster truck theme, but simply because I want to know if the first sailor outfit should feature shorts or a skirt.

Oh, and just for fun, here is another blog entry about the history of sailor suits, as well as a Pinterest board. Enjoy!

Before & After

I did a light refurb on an old woodstove this past autumn. The stove, in fact, is now situated in my living room, though is not yet hooked up, as we’ll need to line the chimney first which is likely to be a fairly expensive undertaking.

This stove is an Danish contraption from the 1970s, based on a style of woodburning stove that the Scandanavians have been using since the Age Of Reason. There is a small firebox with one or more arched chambers above it to extract the maximum amount of heat from the smoke before sending it up the chimney. Therefore you get more heat efficiency out of a smaller amount of fuel.

My parents used this stove in their living room from the early ’90s until maybe 2000. At which point, they replaced the big Warm Morning barrel stove in the basement and the Skov Ovn with a small forced-air gas furnace. The Skov sat out on their back step for a couple of years until I wheedled it, then it sat on my back step for a couple of years until I started feeling guilty about it looking like this:

IMG_2506

Therefore, I bought a couple of tubes of stove-and-fireplace caulk and a bottle of stove blacking and set about restoring it to a somewhat respectable state.

I will let you be the judge as to whether I made a success of the job with the following before-and-after shots:

Untitled

Untitled

I’ve always been particularly fond of the reindeer-pulled chariot and its impressively-busted, toga-wearing driver. As best I can determine, she’s meant to be Diana, who is sometimes depicted as driving a chariot pulled by deer and wielding a bow-and-arrow.

Here she is, crusty:
IMG_2514

And here’s how nicely she cleans up:

IMG_2533

In order to cure the caulk, I had to build a fire in it and then damper it down and basically let the caulk slow-roast itself. The little stove is now beautifully sealed – it used to always smoke a little around the Skov Ovn badge on the heat-extractor chamber, but now, the only place smoke comes out is through the stovepipe hole.

I’m sure it’s not up to any kind of professional standards, but for our household, in which Martha Stewart does not live, it looks like an acceptable job.

A reader caught a typo for me in my Kia Magentis post from the other day – I’d mis-named the Chrysler 300, a leaden and funereal 4-door sedan as a Chrysler 500 (because I have stubby-little-kid-hands and have to take my fingers off home-row to hit the number keys) and he thought I was making a wisecrack about the New Fiat 500. Which I wasn’t, and I’m not really about to now, either.

I’d need to have strong, negative feelings about the car to bust out with snark about it, and those, I don’t have. About all I can say is that I find it a bit twee, but, like the unsentimental asshole that I am, I find many things twee; however, not objectionable enough in their preciousness to churn up much sarcasm much less a quality, bilious rant.

The New 500 is basically a Panda in fancy dress. The Fiat Panda is a low-frills city car that we don’t get the privilege to consider here in the US. It is very much the sort of car I’d purchase, if it were an option, and I was in the market for a car.

As James May notes in his “review” of the 500, you get more car for less money if you buy the Panda. Which is the car he owns, not that this might bias his review. Heh. However, he does note that the costume-drama 500 is a charming and fun-to-drive option, and that if you’re not too hung up on being sensible and are, in fact, interested in looking good, the 500 would actually be a good choice.

No, how I feel about the Fiat 500 is how I feel about the whole raft of retro-styled contemporary cars on the market. The New Mini, the New Dodge Challenger, the Ford Mustang from the 5th Gen on, the Chevy Camaro from the 5th Gen. I think they’re all pretty good lookers, but as machines, not terribly exciting. Many of them are just re-skinned versions of whatever other car the lineup offers that is of the general appropriate size. What they are, is cars for people who won’t drive old cars, but like the looks of yesteryear. Cars for people who want shit like reliability, climate control, and cupholders. They have a place in the world and are ideal for people who like nostalgia but dislike inconvenience. But for myself, they hold no great appeal. I like for a car to be a bit of a challenge, to require some know-how, and to possibly smell a bit strange when it rains.

The only retro-car that I hold a deep and abiding fucking loathing for is the Volkswagen New Beetle. This is in no small part because at one point in my blighted past, I was co-owner of one of these shitful little abominations, and to this day I cannot speak of that car without swearing and spitting out the bitter aftertaste.

Untitled-Scanned-15
The Yellow Car is no longer a part of my life. The green one, however, it’s coming back home this Fall.

The New Beetle had pathetic rear-seat headroom; at 5’5″, I clonked my head on the back seat window frame EVERY time I had to sit back there. The visibility was piss-poor. The car felt cumbersome and wide. The A-Pillar was positioned just perfectly to make viewing oncoming traffic from the left diffficult; the B-Pillar blocked side view if you went to look over your shoulder; and if you tried to rely on the rearview mirror, the C-Pillar created a critical gaping blind spot.

The ground clearance was…minimal. With the New Beetle, one of the first things owners needed to do was put a skidplate on the oilpan. I couldn’t actually take the car up the alley to access the garage behind my old house. Given that Kansas City is notorious for potholes, abandoned roadworks, and large chunks of debris on the freeway, every trip out before the skidplate was fitted caused me nailbiting anxiety.

Oh, and this particular car came from the dealership with a misaligned rear end which destroyed half a set of tires before I could convince them to look into it. During the course of the first two years of owning that car, Northtowne Volkswagen’s maintenance department continually attempted to fleece me with unnecessary repairs while overlooking problems that were real and inconvenient. Had the car itself not been such a flaming load of shit, the way the dealership treated me would have put me off modern Volkswagens.

Now to be honest, I must admit that I’ve never fully forgiven VW for putting the engine in the wrong end of their cars in the 1970s, but I have owned or driven a couple of front-engine VWs that didn’t completely suck. The Golf (upon which the car I’ve been cursing was based) is a serviceable and practical car. The Jetta range is an excellent option for family cars. The ’81 Scirocco I used to have was a five alarm circus when its electrics or fuel injection weren’t malfunctioning. The fuel economy of any VW diesel is fantastic. But I reserve a particular and venomous dislike for the entire New Beetle range.

scirocco
The Scirocco is a car about which I harbor the most mixed feelings. This car was mad as a badger. It was crazy lightweight and was propelled by the 1.8L out of a wrecked Audi Fox. It had a clutch that grabbed like a bulldog, and for as hightailed as the suspension looked, that little beast cornered like it was magnetically attached to the road. First through third were close and tight – with a little bit of commitment and verve, you could chirp the tires with each gear change. Acceleration through fourth and fifth were ready and adequate. This car was at its most fun coming on to or leaving the Interstate. There are a few tight, corkscrew on or off ramps that I dearly loved to accelerate through. When I was a teenager, my Mom taught me how to corner a car; how to let off as you enter the curve, then goose the accelerator near the apex to sucker it down and slingshot out on to the highway at speed.

When the Scirocco was working, it was a runnin’ son-of-a-gun. But, it had the faults of its breed. Shoddy electrics, primitive fuel injection, and chintzy build quality meant that it would stop running unexpectedly, that bits of the interior always rattled, drooped, or fell off, and that any time you sought to evict one gremlin, you’d find three more waiting in line with reservations. When it got beyond my abilities, I took it to a local mechanic I trust. While they did their best to do right by my horrible car, the truth of the matter was, it was becoming a burdensome money-pit.

When I sold that car, I felt a great sense of relief, as it had left me high and dry about as often as it had delivered me to my destination on time and un-frazzled. However, in retrospect, I wish I’d vetted its new owner a bit more thoroughly:

I sold it to a teenaged boy who promptly wrecked it in every possible way a teenaged boy could wreck. Side swiped a dumpster, backed into a retaining wall, and finally stuffed it into a tree. If I’d known that kid would be such an abysmal driver, I’d have held out and sold it to someone who wanted a project car, who’d have done right by that car and enjoyed it, rather than willfully destroyed it.

Bangerwatch Kansas?

Perhaps I’ve fallen a bit too much under the influence of the motoring website Petrolblog, which tends to concentrate on the odd, the low-budget, and the accessible, but I’ve taken to noticing unexceptional cars of late and considering their possibilities as “future classics.”

A few days ago, I was out in Merriam, Kansas, finishing up some errands at Target, and I spied an inexplicable car trundling toward a parking slot near where I’d put the Toyota. I couldn’t put my finger on the make or model; it kind of looked like a Malt-O-Meal knockoff of an S-Type Jaguar. The Fruity Hoops of executive sedans, if you will.

I waited until the owner had headed in to the store, and I went around back of the car to find out what in the blind hell it was. What it was, was something I hadn’t previously heard of. It was a first-generation Kia Magentis. Which is basically a tarted up Hyundai Sonata.

I drove a Hyundai Sonata once. It was a rental. It was basically adequate. I didn’t love it, but it didn’t make me swear and worry like driving the pickup does. It took up a reasonable and civilized portion of the road, had good visibility all the way around, did not get as good of mileage as I would have hoped, and was extremely unexceptional. The grey Sonata would have made an excellent getaway car, as it’s practically invisible.

Anyway, when Kia re-badged the Sonata, they gave it a different, more rounded grille, added in the round fog-lamps inboard of the regular headlights, and basically did what they could to posh up an unexciting and overwhelmingly ordinary car. Because its pretensions are so obvious, because it’s trying so hard to be an S-Type for the Sonata budget, it has a certain cockeyed charm. Sure, Cocoa-Rooties might not taste quite as nice as Cocoa-Pops, but you get twice as many for half the price.

The most delightful point of the Magentis, from my perspective, is that Kia had apparently tried to emulate the S-Type Jaguar, which is considered by Jag aficionados and pretty much everyone else, to be the worst Jaguar. It’s lackluster styling and unremarkable performance actually manage to tarnish the just-plain-snob-appeal of the Jaguar marque. It is a car which shows clear evidence that even designers and engineers at Jaguar simply phone it in occasionally.

Now, I do think this car is interesting in that it’s not that common, and that its design inspiration is so obvious, but would I ever consider buying a low-mileage example if it came up at a sufficiently low asking price? Well, not for myself, I wouldn’t, but I’d definitely try to egg my Mom on toward it.

Back when I had the Sonata on loan, I told Mom that I thought she’d like the car, that it was easy to drive, had a capacious trunk, and seemed like it would be a steady, reliable day-to-day sort of car. However, Mom likes a bit of flash. She likes the “new” Chrysler 300, and mourns the death of the chrome trim strips along the sides of cars. Given that the Magentis was graced with a generous serving of shiny bits up front and was made to look a little flashier than its humble Korean roots would suggest, I think this might be a satisfactory ride for her. It combines the mundane practicality of the Sonata with a bit of hey-look-at-me trim which does help to elevate what would otherwise be an ordinary four-door sedan.

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »